-
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-16-00180-CR JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 66th District Court Hill County, Texas Trial Court No. 38,991 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State,
915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State,
820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2016 Do not publish [CR25] Escamilla v. State Page 2
Document Info
Docket Number: 10-16-00180-CR
Filed Date: 6/22/2016
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/23/2016