Jose Francisco Escamilla v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                    IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-16-00180-CR
    JOSE FRANCISCO ESCAMILLA,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 66th District Court
    Hill County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 38,991
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Jose Francisco Escamilla appeals from the trial court’s interlocutory
    order denying his motion to suppress. The denial of a motion to suppress may not be
    appealed until after the final judgment is entered. McKown v. State, 
    915 S.W.2d 160
    , 161
    (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); see Apolinar v. State, 
    820 S.W.2d 792
    , 794 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1991) (“The courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders
    unless that jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law.”). Accordingly, we dismiss
    this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
    REX D. DAVIS
    Justice
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeal dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed June 22, 2016
    Do not publish
    [CR25]
    Escamilla v. State                                         Page 2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-16-00180-CR

Filed Date: 6/22/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/23/2016