Kyle Stone v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    August 6, 2019
    No. 04-19-00402-CR
    Kyle STONE,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2018CR12634W
    Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Kyle Magee Stone pled guilty to possession of a
    controlled substance. The terms of his plea bargain agreement were as follows: (1) “Class A
    misdemeanor punishment with State Jail Felony Conviction under 12.44 P.C.”; (2) “Punishment
    to be assessed at 90 days BCJ”; (3) “Fine $500”; (4) “There is no application for community
    supervision/deferred adjudication”; and (5) “Full range of punishment if defendant doesn’t
    appear at sentencing.” On March 20, 2019, the trial court sentenced Stone to eighteen months in
    state jail. The judgment reflects that Stone “appeared in person with Counsel.” Appellant’s
    motion for new trial, however, states that “[a]ll parties agree that Kyle Magee Stone failed to
    appear on the day of sentencing.” The record, therefore, is not clear with regard to whether the
    trial court sentenced Stone in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On
    March 20, 2019, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that
    this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.
    25.2(a)(2). After Stone filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the
    certification and notice of appeal to this court. See 
    id. 25.2(e). The
    clerk’s record, which includes
    the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See 
    id. 25.2(d). “In
    a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, (B) after getting the trial court’s
    permission to appeal; or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.” 
    Id. 25.2(a)(2). We
    must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of
    appeal has not been made part of the record.” 
    Id. 25.2(d). This
    appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d)
    unless an amended trial court certification showing that Stone has the right to appeal is made part
    of the appellate record by September 5, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v.
    State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).
    We ORDER all appellate deadlines be suspended until further order of the court.
    _________________________________
    Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 6th day of August, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-19-00402-CR

Filed Date: 8/6/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/8/2019