David Gonzales v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • Order filed November 16, 2017
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-17-00091-CR
    __________
    DAVID GONZALES, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 161st District Court
    Ector County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. B-44,600
    ORDER
    Appellant has filed in this court an unopposed motion to abate this appeal and
    remand the cause to the trial court to address two concerns: an incomplete reporter’s
    record and the lack of findings of fact and conclusions of law related to Appellant’s
    motions to suppress. The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated.
    As asserted by Appellant, the reporter’s record is incomplete. It appears that
    Defendant’s Exhibits No. 4 and No. 7 from the suppression hearing, as well as
    State’s Exhibit No. 6 from the trial on the merits, were not included in the reporter’s
    record filed in this cause. We abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court
    for the trial court to determine whether these hearings were recorded and, if so, to
    direct the court reporter to prepare a supplemental reporter’s record of each hearing.
    If the parties have a dispute involving the items that appear to be missing from the
    appellate record or if the reporter’s records have been lost or destroyed, the trial
    court is directed to resolve that dispute in compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e),
    (f). See Amador v. State, 
    221 S.W.3d 666
    , 676–77 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007);
    Routier v. State, 
    112 S.W.3d 554
     (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); Pierce v. State, No. 03-
    09-00487-CR, 
    2010 WL 3719242
     (Tex. App.—Austin 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not
    designated for publication).
    Additionally, the record shows that Appellant sought to suppress all evidence
    obtained as a result of Appellant’s arrest and detention and any statement made by
    Appellant. The trial court held a hearing on Appellant’s motion to suppress and, at
    the end of the hearing, denied the motion. Appellant requested findings of fact and
    conclusions of law, but the trial court did not enter any findings or conclusions.
    Pursuant to Appellant’s request, we abate the appeal so that such findings and
    conclusions can be properly entered by the trial court. Green v. State, 
    906 S.W.2d 937
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); see State v. Cullen, 
    195 S.W.3d 696
    , 699–700 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2006); Bonham v. State, 
    644 S.W.2d 5
    , 8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983).
    Accordingly, we grant the unopposed motion to abate the appeal and remand
    the cause. The trial court is directed to enter written findings of fact and conclusions
    of law regarding Appellant’s motion to suppress, and the trial court clerk is
    instructed to file in this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing such findings
    and conclusions. If necessary, the trial court is also directed to make appropriate
    findings and recommendations with respect to the missing exhibits. Such findings
    and recommendations and any order entered by the trial court shall also be included
    2
    in the supplemental clerk’s record. The court reporter is directed to prepare and
    forward to this court a supplemental reporter’s record containing the missing
    exhibits and, if a hearing is held in the trial court with respect to this order, a
    supplemental reporter’s record from such hearing. The supplemental records are
    due to be filed in this court on or before December 18, 2017.
    PER CURIAM
    November 16, 2017
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
    3