Elizabeth Ann Black v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                ACCEPTED
    03-15-00065-CR
    6161368
    THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    7/21/2015 3:21:27 PM
    JEFFREY D. KYLE
    CLERK
    NO. 03-15-00065-CR
    __________________________________________________________________
    FILED IN
    3rd COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE AUSTIN, TEXAS
    THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT7/21/2015 3:21:27 PM
    AUSTIN, TEXAS              JEFFREY D. KYLE
    Clerk
    __________________________________________________________________
    ELIZABETH ANN BLACK, APPELLANT
    VS.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    __________________________________________________________________
    ON APPEAL FROM
    COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW NUMBER FIVE
    TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    CAUSE NO. C1-CR-13-217530
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF
    __________________________________________________________________
    MERIL “GENE” ANTHES, JR.
    State Bar No. 24040125
    Gene@GBAfirm.Com
    CHRISTOPHER M. GUNTER
    State Bar No. 08624600
    Chris@GBAfirm.Com
    GUNTER, BENNETT & ANTHES, P.C.
    600 West Ninth Street
    Austin, Texas 78701-2212
    (512) 476-2494
    (512) 476-2497 Facsimile
    Attorneys for Appellant
    __________________________________________________________________
    ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED
    __________________________________________________________________
    IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL
    1.   Appellant:                              Elizabeth Ann Black
    2.   Appellee:                               The State of Texas
    3.   Trial counsel for Appellant:            Christopher M. Gunter and
    Meril “Gene” Anthes, Jr.
    Gunter, Bennett & Anthes, P.C.
    600 West Ninth Street
    Austin, Texas 78701
    4.   Trial counsel for the State:            Christyne Harris Schultz
    Assistant County Attorney
    Travis County, Texas
    P.O. Box 1748
    Austin, Texas 78767
    5.   Counsel on appeal for Appellant:        Meril “Gene” Anthes, Jr. and
    Christopher M. Gunter
    Gunter, Bennett & Anthes, P.C.
    600 West Ninth Street
    Austin, Texas 78701
    6.   Counsel on appeal for the State:        Giselle Horton
    Assistant County Attorney
    Travis County, Texas
    P.O. Box 1748
    Austin, Texas 78767
    7.   Trial Judge:                           The Honorable Nancy Hohengarten
    County Court-at-Law No. Five
    Travis County, Texas
    Blackwell/Thurman Criminal Justice Center
    509 West 11th, 4th Floor
    Austin, Texas 78701
    i
    TABLE OF CONTENTS
    PAGE
    IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL .........................................................                               i
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ ii
    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES................................................................................... iii
    ARGUMENT .......................................................................................................... 1
    PRAYER ................................................................................................................. 3
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ...................................................................... 5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ............................................................................... 5
    ii
    INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
    CASES                                                                             PAGE
    State v. Duran, 396 S.W3d 563 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) ..........................     1-2
    iii
    NO. 03-15-00065-CR
    __________________________________________________________________
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    __________________________________________________________________
    ELIZABETH ANN BLACK, APPELLANT
    VS.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    __________________________________________________________________
    ON APPEAL FROM
    COUNTY COURT-AT-LAW NUMBER FIVE
    TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    CAUSE NO. C1-CR-13-217530
    __________________________________________________________________
    APPELLANT’S REPLY BRIEF
    __________________________________________________________________
    TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:
    COMES NOW Appellant Elizabeth Ann Black, by and through her
    undersigned counsel, and offers Appellant’s Reply Brief, by which Appellant
    respectfully shows the Court the following:
    ARGUMENT
    The State improperly argues that statements made by Appellant after she
    was stopped by Officer Dominguez can be used to justify the stop. State’s Brief 3,
    4, 8. A detention is either good or bad at the moment it starts. State v. Duran, 396
    
    1 S.W.3d 563
    , 569-570 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Information that the officer either
    acquired or noticed after a detention or arrest cannot be considered in determining
    whether an officer had reasonable suspicion to believe a crime had been committed
    or was being committed. 
    Id. at 569.
    It should be noted that in addition to improperly arguing post-detention
    statements by Appellant to justify the stop the state misrepresents what Appellant
    actually told the officer. For instance, the State asserts, “Black told Rodriguez that
    she had seen the barricade but was trying to get home.” State’s Brief at 3. The
    videotape, however, makes clear that Appellant told him the opposite, that she
    didn’t see a barricade.
    (Officer Dominguez) Did you not see the barricade?
    (Appellant) No, sorry I live right over there.
    (Officer Dominguez) I don’t care where you live…you didn’t see the
    barricade?
    (Appellant) No, I did not.
    3 RR State’s Exhibit #1 @ 3:00:30
    In making Appellant’s statements the centerpiece of its argument, the State
    ignores the facts that demonstrate a lack of reasonable suspicion to believe
    Appellant was committing or had committed a crime:
     The lane in which Appellant was traveling was wide open. 1 RR 18-
    19.
    2
     There was no barricade in Appellant’s lane. 1 RR 18-19.
     The police officer was parked behind a barricade in the adjacent lane
    to Appellant’s lane. 1 RR 8, 18-19.
     The officer was not outside his vehicle directing drivers to stop as
    Appellant’s vehicle approached. 3 RR State’s Exhibit 1 @ 2:59:40.
    He was sitting in his vehicle until Appellant’s vehicle was virtually
    even with the officer’s car and he only yelled “Hey” as she drove past
    him. 3 RR State’s Exhibit 1 @ 2:59:42; 2 RR 9-10; 20.
     The officer’s flashing overhead lights were not on as he sat behind the
    barricade. 2 RR 19-20.
     A sign was present informing drivers such as Appellant that Barton
    Springs Rd. was to close at midnight Friday, 21 hours in the future.
    Nothing about the sign indicated the road was then closed. The sign
    read: “Barton Springs Rd. to close Friday 12 a.m. until Monday 3
    a.m.” 2 RR 22-23.
     Appellant did not ignore or fail to heed any sign.
     Appellant did not go around or through any barricade; she simply
    drove past a barricade that was in the adjoining lane.
    PRAYER
    For the reasons set out above, Appellant respectfully prays this Court
    overrule the trial court’s ruling and order that Appellant’s motion to suppress be
    granted.
    3
    Respectfully submitted,
    ___________________________
    MERIL “GENE” ANTHES, JR.
    State Bar No. 24040125
    CHRISTOPHER M. GUNTER
    State Bar No. 08624600
    GUNTER, BENNETT & ANTHES, P.C.
    600 West Ninth Street
    Austin, Texas 78701-2212
    (512) 476-2494
    (512) 476-2497 Facsimile
    Attorneys for Appellant
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
    I certify that this document was prepared with Microsoft Word, and that,
    according to that program’s word-count function, the sections covered by Texas
    Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4(i) contain 492 words.
    ____________________________
    MERIL “GENE” ANTHES, JR.
    CHRISTOPHER M. GUNTER
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s
    Brief sent via certified mail to PO Box 1748, Austin, Texas 78767 to Giselle
    Horton, Assistant County Attorney, Travis County, P.O. Box 1748, Austin, Texas
    78767, on this the 22nd day of July, 2015.
    ____________________________
    MERIL “GENE” ANTHES, JR.
    CHRISTOPHER M. GUNTER
    5
    July 21, 2015
    Honorable Jeffrey D. Kyle                                               Via Electronic Delivery
    Clerk of the Court
    Austin Court of Appeals
    Price Daniel Sr. Building
    209 West 14th Street, Room 101
    Austin, Texas 78701
    RE:     The State of Texas
    vs.
    Elizabeth Black
    No. 03-15-00065-CR
    On Appeal from Travis County
    Court-at-law Number Five
    Cause No. C1CR-13-217530
    Dear Mr. Kyle:
    Enclosed for filing please find Appellant’s Reply Brief in the above-referenced cause.
    Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please feel free to contact me should you
    have any questions.
    Best regards,
    Gene Anthes
    cc:    Giselle Horton
    Assistant Travis County Attorney
    P.O. Box 1748
    Austin, Texas 78767
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-15-00065-CR

Filed Date: 7/21/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/30/2016