Luis Ocegueda v. State ( 2016 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued December 20, 2016
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    For The
    First District of Texas
    ————————————
    NO. 01-16-00715-CR
    ———————————
    LUIS OCEGUEDA, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 183rd District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Case No. 1476508
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Luis Ocegueda, pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery. In
    accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, the
    trial court sentenced appellant to 5 years’ incarceration in the Institutional Division
    of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of
    appeal.
    In a plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
    raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s
    permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); TEX. R.
    APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the
    defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.
    P. 25.2(d).
    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See 
    id. The trial
    court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the
    defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports
    the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 615 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.
    See Chavez v. State, 
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of
    appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-
    bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal
    without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
    pending motions as moot.
    PER CURIAM
    2
    Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
    Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-16-00715-CR

Filed Date: 12/20/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/26/2016