Jeeva Anandham v. Ambika Anandham ( 2016 )

In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
________________
NO. 09-16-00361-CV
________________
JEEVA ANANDHAM, Appellant
V.
AMBIKA ANANDHAM, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 317th District Court
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. C-226,683
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 7, 2016, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal was
filed late, but within the extension time permitted by Rule 26.3 of the Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The appellant, Jeeva Anandham,
did not respond to the Court’s notices and did not file a motion for extension of
time to file a notice of appeal.
The Court finds that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex. R.
App. P. 26.1. No motion for extension of time was timely filed pursuant to Tex. R.
1
App. P. 26.3. The Court finds it is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
______________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Submitted on November 2, 2016
Opinion Delivered November 3, 2016
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
2