State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                          NO. 12-17-00039-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR                                    §    APPEAL FROM THE
    THE BEST INTEREST AND                                     §    COUNTY COURT AT LAW
    PROTECTION OF E. H.                                       §    CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant’s docketing statement
    was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., January 30, 2017. On
    January 31, 2017, this Court requested that Appellant file a docketing statement within ten days
    if he had not already done so. Appellant did not file the docketing statement as requested.
    On February 15, this Court issued a second notice advising Appellant that the docketing
    statement was past due. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement was
    filed on or before February 27, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with
    Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed,
    and Appellant has not complied with the Court’s request.
    Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is
    dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).
    Opinion delivered March 1, 2017.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    MARCH 1, 2017
    NO. 12-17-00039-CV
    THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST
    INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF E. H.
    Appeal from the County Court at Law
    of Cherokee County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 42057)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being
    considered, it is the opinion of this Court that this appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court
    below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-17-00039-CV

Filed Date: 3/1/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/8/2017