Vera Leoma Kibbe v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    ____________________
    NO. 09-17-00469-CR
    ____________________
    VERA LEOMA KIBBE, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 252nd District Court
    Jefferson County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 15-22531
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Vera Leoma Kibbe pleaded
    guilty to felony driving while intoxicated. The trial court found Kibbe guilty and
    assessed punishment at ten years of confinement, then suspended imposition of
    sentence, placed Kibbe on community supervision for five years, and assessed a
    $1000 fine. Subsequently, the State filed a motion to revoke Kibbe’s community
    supervision. Kibbe pleaded “true” to two violations of the terms of the community
    supervision order. The trial court found that Kibbe violated the terms of the
    1
    community supervision order, revoked Kibbe’s community supervision, and
    imposed a sentence of ten years of confinement.1
    Kibbe’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional
    evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    1978). On February 27, 2018, we granted an extension of time for Kibbe to file a
    pro se brief. We received no response from Kibbe.
    We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion
    that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order
    appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.2
    AFFIRMED.
    ______________________________
    STEVE McKEITHEN
    Chief Justice
    1
    We note that the trial court’s written Judgment Revoking Community
    Supervision incompletely recites the trial court findings as “True” to counts three
    and four. The reporter’s record from the hearing on the motion to revoke Kibbe’s
    community supervision reflects that the trial court found counts one, two, three, and
    four to be “true.”
    2
    Kibbe may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
    discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
    2
    Submitted on June 19, 2018
    Opinion Delivered July 11, 2018
    Do Not Publish
    Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-17-00469-CR

Filed Date: 7/11/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/13/2018