Ex Parte Medger Chauncey Duckens ( 2022 )

Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed October 4, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00576-CR EX PARTE MEDGER CHAUNCEY DUCKENS, Appellant On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1688385 CONCURRING OPINION I respectfully concur. The majority opinion discusses whether the State’s conduct in this case is substantially unconstitutional, thus implying that there is a permissible category of unconstitutional restrictions because they do not constitute a “substantial” violation. Because I believe that all unconstitutional restrictions should have a remedy but that the State’s actions are not unconstitutional in this case, I concur. /s/ Meagan Hassan Justice Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan (Jewell, J., majority). Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).