Willie Earl Greer v. State ( 2010 )

COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
§
WILLIE EARL GREER, No. 08-10-00012-CR
§
Appellant, Appeal from
§
v. Criminal District Court
§
THE STATE OF TEXAS, of Jefferson County, Texas
§
Appellee. (TC # 08-03862)
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Willie Earl Greer appeals his conviction for burglary of a building. The trial court placed
Appellant on deferred adjudication community supervision for term of five years. The State
subsequently filed a motion to revoke alleging a violation of the terms and conditions of community
supervision. Based on Appellant’s plea of true, the trial court granted the State’s motion, adjudicated
Appellant guilty, and assessed his punishment at confinement in the state jail nine months. We
affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094,
18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why,
in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969).
A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his
right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief, and agree that the appeal is
wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
October 13, 2010
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)