Matthew Ayrton Shipp v. State ( 2018 )

FILE COPY
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
No. 02-17-00362-CR
No. 02-17-00363-CR
MATTHEW AYRTON SHIPP, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 432nd District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 1485913D, 1498473D
ABATEMENT ORDER
It has come to our attention that appellant’s brief has not been filed.
Appellant’s brief was originally due on January 18, 2018. This court has previously
granted four extensions of time to file appellant’s brief in this case. We have notified
FILE COPY
the trial court judge and the attorneys of record that appellant’s brief has not been
filed, as required by rule 38.8(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Because we have not
received a satisfactory response to our prior notification and in accordance with rule
38.8(b), we abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court.
The trial court shall conduct a hearing, with appellant and appointed counsel,
Jack V. Strickland, present. At the hearing, the court shall make the following
findings on the record:
1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. Determine why appointed counsel has not filed a brief and
whether counsel has abandoned the appeal;
3. If appointed counsel has not abandoned the appeal and appellant
desires to continue the appeal, determine the exact date that
counsel will file a brief on appellant’s behalf in the court of
appeals;
4. Determine whether substitute counsel should be appointed to
represent appellant and appoint substitute counsel, if necessary;1
5. Determine whether appellant desires to proceed pro se. If so,
admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-
representation in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S.
806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975) and Hubbard v. State, 739
S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987) and determine whether
appellant’s decision to proceed pro se is competently and
intelligently made; and
1If substitute counsel has been appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental record
shall reflect that substitute counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is
incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in the county for a reasonable period of time to
allow substitute counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.
2
FILE COPY
6. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to
insure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal.
The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before
Monday, November 26, 2018. The record shall include a supplemental reporter's
record and supplemental clerk's record. Upon our receipt of the supplemental record,
the appeal of this cause shall be reinstated automatically without further order.
The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of
record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.
Dated October 25, 2018.
Per Curiam
3