in Re: Joshua Cornell Skinner ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • DISMISSED and Opinion Filed October 28, 2022
    S  In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-22-01132-CV
    IN RE JOSHUA CORNELL SKINNER, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 204th Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. F15-20176
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith
    Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
    Before the Court is relator’s October 19, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus.
    This Court previously affirmed, as modified, relator’s conviction for aggravated
    sexual assault of a child under the age of fourteen. See Skinner v. State, No. 05-17-
    00153-CR, 
    2018 WL 3545023
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 24, 2018, pet. ref’d)
    (mem. op., not designated for publication). In his petition, relator contends that his
    sentence is void, his constitutional rights were violated during his trial, his trial and
    appellate counsel were ineffective, the trial court erred by overruling a motion for
    directed verdict, the trial court erred by allowing “kidnapping” to be removed from
    the jury charge, and he is being detained illegally. Relator requests this Court to
    reverse his conviction and acquit relator.
    We construe relator’s petition as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See In
    re Noble, No. 05-11-00975-CV, 
    2011 WL 3558802
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Aug.
    15, 2011, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (construing motion for leave to file writ of
    mandamus wherein relator sought to “present his innocence” and to cease “being
    unlawfully restrained” as a petition for writ of habeas corpus). This Court does not
    have original jurisdiction to consider petitions seeking habeas relief generated in
    connection with criminal convictions. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05;
    TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d); In re Neal, No. 05-22-01010-CV, 
    2022 WL 6935531
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 12, 2022, orig. proceeding).
    Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction.
    /Robert D. Burns, III/
    ROBERT D. BURNS, III
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    221132F.P05
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-22-01132-CV

Filed Date: 10/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2022