in the Matter of C.S.G., Jr., a Juvenile ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
    No. 06-22-00006-CV
    IN THE MATTER OF C.S.G., JR., A JUVENILE
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    Bowie County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 21JV0037-CCL
    Before Morriss, C.J., Stevens and van Cleef, JJ.
    ORDER
    In this case involving a disposition order committing C.S.G., Jr., to the Texas Juvenile
    Justice Department for a period of ten years with a possible transfer to the Texas Department of
    Criminal Justice, both parties agree that the order failed to comply with the requirements of
    Section 54.04(f) of the Texas Family Code. The State has filed a motion asking this Court to
    abate the matter to the trial court to address that issue.
    Section 54.04(f) states, “The court shall state specifically in the order its reasons for
    disposition and shall furnish a copy of the order to the child.” TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.04(f).
    “Compliance with [this] requirement[] is mandatory, for such findings ‘provide assurance that
    the child and his family will be advised of the reasons . . . and . . . be in a position to challenge
    those reasons on appeal.” In re J.M., 
    287 S.W.3d 481
    , 489 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2009, no
    pet.) (quoting J.L.E. v. State, 
    571 S.W.2d 556
    , 557 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1978, no
    writ)). “Therefore, merely reciting statutory language will not be sufficient to justify the juvenile
    court’s ruling.” 
    Id.
     Nevertheless, “statutory language supplemented by additional findings is
    sufficient to meet the requirements of the Texas Family Code.” Id.; see In re W.A.M.P., No. 14-
    21-00105-CV, 
    2022 WL 2976876
    , at *3 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 28, 2022, no pet.
    h.) (mem. op.) (reciting statutory language and supplementing with additional specific findings
    may be sufficient to meet requirements of Section 54.04(f)). “[T]he inclusion of the offense and
    its surrounding circumstances in an order consisting of mainly statutory language is sufficient.”
    
    Id.
     at 490 (citing In re J.T.H., 
    779 S.W.2d 954
    , 959 (Tex. App.—Austin 1989, no writ)).
    2
    The order here recites statutory language and does not describe or list the offense, other
    than to include a deadly weapon finding, as required by Section 54.04(g). See TEX. FAM. CODE
    ANN. § 54.04(g). Although the order ostensibly includes four additional findings, those findings
    are largely generic and lack the degree of specificity required by Section 54.04(f). See TEX.
    FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.04(f); In re J.M., 
    287 S.W.3d at
    488–89.
    When a juvenile court fails to comply with the specificity requirements of Section
    54.04(f), we abate the matter to the trial court with instructions for the court to render a proper
    disposition order specifically stating the reasons for the disposition. In re J.M., 
    287 S.W.3d at
    489 (citing K.K.H. v. State, 
    612 S.W.2d 657
    , 658 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1981, no writ)); see TEX.
    R. APP. P. 44.4.
    Pursuant to Rule 44.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we abate this matter to
    the juvenile court with instructions to render a modified disposition order that includes specific
    findings supporting the disposition. A supplemental record containing the modified disposition
    order should be filed in this court no later than August 24, 2022.
    All appellate timetables are stayed pending return of this matter to the jurisdiction of this
    Court.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    BY THE COURT
    Date: August 10, 2022
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 06-22-00006-CV

Filed Date: 8/10/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/17/2022