Larry Gene Strickland II v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBERS 13-22-00193-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    LARRY GENE STRICKLAND II,                                                                Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                        Appellee.
    On appeal from the 355th District Court
    of Hood County, Texas.
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva
    Order Per Curiam
    Appellant Larry Gene Strickland II’s appointed counsel, E. Mark Piland, has filed
    an unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel in this appeal. 1 According to the motion, a
    1 This case is before the Thirteenth Court of Appeals by transfer from the Second Court of Appeals
    pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
    § 73.001.
    conflict of interest has developed in the case which prevents Piland from representing the
    appellant in this cause.
    The appointment of new counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.
    See, e.g., Carroll v. State, 
    176 S.W.3d 249
    , 255 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004,
    pet. ref’d). In those circumstances where the appointment of counsel may be necessary,
    an appellate court should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this
    issue. Accordingly, we carry the motion to withdraw with the case, abate the appeal, and
    remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order.
    Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant’s counsel should
    be allowed to withdraw, and if so, whether appellant is entitled to new court-appointed
    counsel. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name,
    address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed
    counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. If the trial court determines
    appellant has abandoned this appeal and/or is not entitled to court-appointment counsel,
    it shall issue such findings. The trial court shall further cause its findings and orders to be
    included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with the Clerk of the Court on or
    before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed on the
    7th day of October, 2022.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-22-00193-CR

Filed Date: 10/7/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/10/2022