Reynolds Energy Transport, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc. v. Plains Marketing, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P. ( 2022 )

FILE COPY Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 10, 2022 No. 04-22-00450-CV REYNOLDS ENERGY TRANSPORT, LLC and Reynolds Transportation, Inc., Appellants v. PLAINS MARKETING, L.P., Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Plains Pipeline, L.P., Appellees From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2022-CI-11568 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding ORDER Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice On October 6, 2022, appellants filed: (1) a “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4”; and (2) an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” Both motions challenge the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order setting a supersedeas bond to stay execution of an underlying sanctions judgment against appellants. Appellees subsequently filed a response to appellants’ emergency motion. After reviewing appellants’ emergency motion and appellees’ response, we DENY appellants’ “Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay in Connection with Rule 24.2 Motion.” We further DENY appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the trial court’s inclusion of the amount of the underlying sanctions judgment in the calculation of the supersedeas bond. We invite appellees to file a response to appellants’ “Motion for Appellate Review Under Rule 24.4” to the extent that the motion challenges the interest rate applied in the trial court’s October 5, 2022 order. Appellees’ response, if any, is due by October 22, 2022. _________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice FILE COPY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of October, 2022. ___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court