Ali Faris v. Travis Park ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-22-00495-CV
    Ali Faris, Appellant
    v.
    Travis Park, Appellee
    FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
    NO. C-1-CV-22-001101, THE HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On August 12, 2022, appellant Ali Faris filed a notice of appeal. Faris appeals
    from the final judgment signed by the trial court on June 21, 2022. Because the judgment was
    signed on June 21, 2022, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before July 21, 2022.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1 (requiring notice of appeal to be filed within 30 days after judgment is
    signed). That July 21, 2022 deadline might have been extended until August 5, 2022, if Faris
    had filed either a notice of appeal with the trial court or a motion for extension of time with this
    Court within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal. See id. R. 26.3; Verburgt
    v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617-18 (Tex. 1997) (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for
    extension of time under Rule 41(a)(2) [now Rule 26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke
    the appellate court’s jurisdiction.”).
    On September 21, 2022, after an initial review of the clerk’s record, the Clerk of
    this Court sent Faris a letter informing her that the Court appears to lack jurisdiction over the
    appeal for the reasons stated above and requesting a response informing us of any basis that
    exists for jurisdiction. Faris’s response does not present any information that allows the Court to
    extend the deadline to file the notice of appeal. Faris’s August 12, 2022 notice of appeal is
    untimely, and we therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b)
    (providing that filing notice of appeal invokes appellate court’s jurisdiction); 
    id.
     R. 2
    (establishing that appellate court may not alter time for perfecting appeal in civil case).
    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See 
    id.
     R. 42.3(a).
    __________________________________________
    Gisela D. Triana, Justice
    Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justice Triana, and Justice Smith
    Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
    Filed: October 18, 2022
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-22-00495-CV

Filed Date: 10/18/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2022