in Re: William Lisle and Smith Lisle Holdings, Ltd. ( 2022 )

DENY and Opinion Filed October 12, 2022
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-00822-CV
IN RE WILLIAM LISLE AND SMITH LISLE HOLDINGS, LTD., Relators
Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 416-00639-2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein
Opinion by Justice Nowell
Relators ask the trial court for a writ of mandamus to vacate an order enforcing
a permanent injunction and an order denying approval of relators’ proposed solution
to a drainage problem. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that
the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that they lack an adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding).
After reviewing the petition, the response, the reply, and the record before us,
we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled to mandamus relief.
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Erin A. Nowell/
220822f.p05 ERIN A. NOWELL
JUSTICE
–2–