Manuel Martinez III v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-22-00113-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    MANUEL MARTINEZ III,                                                          Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                            Appellee.
    On appeal from the 93rd District Court
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva
    Order Per Curiam
    This appeal is before the Court on the State’s motion to abate this appeal.
    According to the motion, the State discovered that the presentence investigation report
    (PSI) was not included in the appellate record, and the State requires that document in
    order to complete its brief in this matter. The State requests that we “abate the appeal for
    the purpose of allowing the trial court to unseal the PSI for purposes of including said PSI
    in the appellate record.”
    We abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court. The trial court shall
    cause a hearing to be held to determine: (1) if the PSI was part of the trial court’s record;
    (2) whether it should be submitted as part of the clerk’s record or reporter’s record in this
    appeal; and (3) if any part of the reporter’s record is missing, lost, destroyed, or otherwise
    inaccessible. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c), (d); id. R. 34.6(d), (e), (f). We note that this
    abatement should be used for the purpose of correcting and completing the appellate
    record in this case and should not be construed as to allow for the creation of a new trial
    court record. See, e.g., Williams v. State, 
    937 S.W.2d 479
    , 487 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996);
    see also In re J.R., No. 07-18-00240-CV, 
    2018 WL 7488914
    , at *2 (Tex. App.—Amarillo
    Sept. 26, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (collecting cases); Gerdes v. Marion State Bank, 
    774 S.W.2d 63
    , 65–66 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1989, writ denied).
    The trial court shall determine what steps are necessary to ensure the prompt
    preparation of any supplemental records and shall enter any orders required to avoid
    further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. The trial court shall cause its findings,
    together with any orders it may enter, to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.
    Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter’s record of any
    proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk’s record and supplemental reporter’s
    record shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days
    from the date of this order.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed on the
    28th day of October, 2022.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-22-00113-CR

Filed Date: 10/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2022