EX PARTE: Michael Kruppenbacher ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Order entered October 28, 2022
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-22-00904-CR
    EX PARTE MICHAEL KRUPPENBACHER
    On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. WX22-92138-U
    ORDER
    Before the Court is appellant’s October 24, 2022 motion for an extension of
    time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed
    by November 8, 2022. The State’s brief shall be due by November 29, 2022.
    After reviewing the clerk’s record filed on October 18, 2022, the Court
    questions its jurisdiction over the appeal. In an appeal from a habeas matter, the
    Court’s jurisdiction is triggered by the filing of a notice of appeal within thirty
    days after the trial court enters an appealable order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).
    The clerk’s record reflects the district court referred appellant’s habeas
    application to a magistrate for hearing. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 54.306(a)(8);
    see also Ex parte Edwards, No. 05-03-00556-CR, 
    2003 WL 21962575
    , at *3 (Tex.
    App.—Dallas Aug. 18, 2003, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (holding that
    under proper referral from trial court, Dallas County magistrates may hear habeas
    applications challenging extraditions). After hearing the matter, the magistrate
    denied relief and prepared proposed findings and recommendations. The record
    does not show the magistrate’s proposed findings and recommendations were
    considered or adopted by the district court. There is no other written order in the
    record that could serve as the basis for an appeal. Thus, the Court questions
    whether a proposed set of findings and recommendations from the magistrate
    constitutes an appealable order sufficient to invoke the Court’s jurisdiction.
    Additionally, the record does not contain a certification of the right to
    appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a); Cortez v. State, 
    420 S.W.3d 803
    , 807 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 2013).
    To expedite the resolution of this extradition appeal, the Court ORDERS the
    parties to address the issue of the Court’s jurisdiction in their briefs.
    We further ORDER the trial court to prepare a certification of the right to
    appeal for this case and file it as a supplemental record within FOURTEEN
    DAYS of the date of this order.
    We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit a copy of this order to the
    Honorable Stephanie Huff, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; the
    –2–
    Honorable Anthony Randall, Dallas County Magistrate Judge, Auxiliary Court No.
    2; and to counsel for the parties.
    /s/   AMANDA L. REICHEK
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-22-00904-CR

Filed Date: 10/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/2/2022