Jack Carpenter v. Ina Claire Watson, Individually and as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                                      In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    __________________
    NO. 09-22-00216-CV
    __________________
    JACK CARPENTER, Appellant
    V.
    INA CLAIRE WATSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE
    FRANK AND INA WATSON FAMILY LIVING TRUST, Appellee
    __________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 258th District Court
    San Jacinto County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. CV14,744
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Jack Carpenter and Appellee Ina Claire Watson, Individually and
    as Trustee of the Frank and Ina Watson Family Living Trust, filed a Joint Motion to
    Dismiss Without Prejudice. The parties have agreed that the trial court’s order
    granting Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment is an interlocutory order.
    On February 22, 2022, the trial court signed an order that granted Watson’s
    motion for a no-evidence summary judgment and dismissed Carpenter’s affirmative
    1
    defenses of “limitations, collateral estoppel, waiver, and laches[.]” On June 8, 2022,
    the trial court signed an order that dismissed Carpenter’s claims that he “acquired
    superior title to the property in dispute . . . by limitation by adversely possessing the
    property in dispute[.]” The trial court’s orders lack language that clearly and
    unequivocally demonstrates that the trial court intended the order to completely
    dispose of the entire case. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 205 (Tex.
    2001).
    Through their joint motion, Carpenter and Watson agree that the appeal
    should be dismissed because the trial court has not signed a final judgment that
    disposes of every pending claim and party before the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P.
    42.1(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 43.2(f).
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on November 2, 2022
    Opinion Delivered November 3, 2022
    Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-22-00216-CV

Filed Date: 11/3/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2022