George Schilter, in His Capacity as the Independent of the Estate of Kathrin Gvadia v. Zachary T. Dixon ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • Order filed November 3, 2022
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    ____________
    NO. 14-22-00688-CV
    ____________
    GEORGE SCHILTER, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE INDEPENDENT
    EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRIN GVADIA,
    DECEASED, Appellant
    V.
    ZACHARY T. DIXON, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 151st District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 2020-79584
    ORDER
    This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 13, 2022. Appellant timely
    filed a post-judgment motion. The notice of appeal was due September 12, 2022.
    See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed the notice of appeal on
    September 23, 2022, a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal.
    A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when the perfecting
    instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the
    notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to
    come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. See Miller v.
    Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 
    974 S.W.2d 805
    , 808 (Tex. App.—
    Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
    Accordingly, we order appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file
    the notice of appeal within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal without
    further notice for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
    PER CURIAM
    Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-22-00688-CV

Filed Date: 11/3/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2022