in Re: Russell Wilson II, in His Official Capacity as Attorney Pro Tem for the State of Texas, Dallas County, Texas ( 2022 )

DENY and Opinion Filed November 4, 2022
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-22-01047-CV
IN RE RUSSELL WILSON II, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
ATTORNEY PRO TEM FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS, DALLAS COUNTY,
TEXAS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F19-00719
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Partida-Kipness, and Justice Smith
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
Before the Court is relator’s October 5, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus in
which he challenges the trial court’s (1) Order Relating to Attorney Pro Tem and
(2) Order on Defense’s Objection to the State Motion or Notice to Withdraw Intent
to Consolidate.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
Because relator has not submitted an adequate record, we are unable to conduct a
meaningful review of his claims. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a)(1).
Moreover, some of the documents included in the record are not certified by a trial
court clerk or adequately sworn copies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a); In re
Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding) (requiring
relator to submit a record containing certified or sworn copies). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
221047F.P05
–2–