Johnathan Fisher v. Budget Suites of America ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • VACATE and DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 17, 2022
    S  In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-22-00703-CV
    JOHNATHAN FISHER, Appellant
    V.
    BUDGET SUITES OF AMERICA, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02407-E
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Pedersen, III, and Justice Garcia
    Opinion by Justice Garcia
    This appeal follows the trial court’s judgment in a forcible detainer suit
    awarding Budget Suites of America exclusive and immediate possession of a room
    appellant occupied at the extended-stay. Asserting the appeal has become moot
    because appellant was served with a writ of possession and has been removed from
    the room, Budget Suites has filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
    It is well-settled that a court lacks jurisdiction to consider a case that has
    become moot. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n v. Jones, 
    1 S.W.3d 83
    , 86 (Tex.
    1999). A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties.
    See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 
    166 S.W.3d 732
    , 737 (Tex. 2005). If a case
    becomes moot on appeal, an appellate court must set aside the trial court’s judgment
    and dismiss the case. See Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of City of San Antonio, 
    198 S.W.3d 782
    , 785, 790 (Tex. 2006).
    A forcible detainer action is a procedure to determine which party has the right
    to immediate possession of the property. See Rice v. Pinney, 
    51 S.W.3d 705
    , 709
    (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). If a tenant appeals from a judgment awarding
    possession to the landlord but fails to supersede the judgment and is no longer in
    possession of the property, the appeal is moot unless the tenant asserts a potentially
    meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property.         See
    Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 786-87; Olley v. HVM, L.L.C., 
    449 S.W.3d 572
    , 575 (Tex.
    App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied).
    Budget Suites’s motion has been on file for more than ten days, and appellant
    has not filed a response or otherwise contested the assertion that he has been evicted
    or argued a claim of right to current, actual possession of the room. Accordingly,
    we grant the motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and dismiss the case as moot.
    See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 790.
    /Dennise Garcia/
    DENNISE GARCIA
    JUSTICE
    220703F.P05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    JOHNATHAN FISHER, Appellant                 On Appeal from the County Court at
    Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-22-00703-CV         V.               Trial Court Cause No. CC-22-02407-
    E.
    BUDGET SUITES OF AMERICA,                   Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia,
    Appellee                                    Chief Justice Burns and Justice
    Pedersen, III participating.
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial
    court’s July 28, 2022 judgment and DISMISS the case as moot.
    Judgment entered this 17th day of November 2022.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-22-00703-CV

Filed Date: 11/17/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/23/2022