Ira W. Brewer, Eugenia Brewer and All Other Occupants v. U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the Bear Sterns Arm Trust ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Opinion Filed April 6, 2015
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-14-00045-CV
    IRA W. BREWER, EUGENIA BREWER AND ALL OTHER
    OCCUPANTS OF 2 CANNONERO CIR, WYLIE, TX 75098, Appellants
    V.
    U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS
    OF THE BEAR STEARNS ARM TRUST, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH
    CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-2, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
    Collin County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 005-01529-2013
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill
    Opinion by Justice Whitehill
    Appellants appeal a summary judgment rendered against them.              They argue that
    appellee’s evidence regarding one element of appellee’s claim was inadmissible and thus there
    was no evidence supporting the appellee on that element. We affirm.
    I. BACKGROUND
    This case began in justice court when appellee U.S. Bank filed an original petition for
    forcible detainer against appellants (collectively the “Brewers”). The Bank alleged that it bought
    the subject property at a foreclosure sale, the Brewers were occupying the property as tenants at
    sufferance, and the Bank was entitled to a judgment of possession. The justice court rendered
    judgment for the Brewers, and the Bank appealed to the county court at law. The Bank then
    moved for summary judgment, seeking a decree that the Brewers were guilty of forcible detainer
    and that the Bank was entitled to possession of the property.
    The Brewers filed a summary-judgment response in which they (i) objected to the Bank’s
    evidence proving that notice to vacate was given and (ii) argued that the Bank had failed to prove
    its ownership of the note, its right to foreclose, or its ownership of the property. The trial judge
    signed a general order granting summary judgment for the Bank.
    The Brewers timely appealed.
    II. ANALYSIS
    The Brewers assert one issue on appeal, urging that the trial court should have sustained
    their objections to one of U.S. Bank’s summary-judgment exhibits. This, they argue, would have
    left the Bank with no evidence of an essential element of its claim—that the statutorily required
    notice to vacate was given. We resolve the Brewers’ issue against them for the following
    reasons.
    First, we review the Bank’s summary-judgment evidence of notice. As Exhibit C to its
    motion, the Bank attached:
    •       An affidavit by Arianna L. Black purporting to prove up five attached
    pages as business records;
    •       A two-page “Notice to Vacate and Demand for Possession” addressed to
    the Brewers at the property’s address;
    •       A two-page “Exhibit A to Affidavit of Mailing” listing the Brewers and
    the property’s address;
    •       A one-page “Affidavit of Mailing,” executed by Clifton McBride, in
    which he testifies, “[A]t the request of TX Evictions on 11/28/2012, I
    deposited in the United States mail a copy of the attached document, in
    separate sealed envelopes, in accordance with the checked mailing classes
    defined below, postage prepaid, to the address list on exhibit A, attached
    hereto and made a part hereof.” Below that paragraph, boxes labeled
    “First Class” and “Certified Return” are checked.
    –2–
    Thus, the McBride affidavit and its attachments independently proved that notice to vacate was
    sent to the Brewers at the property’s address on November 28, 2012. The Black affidavit
    actually adds nothing to the Bank’s proof of notice.
    In the trial court, the Brewers objected to the Black affidavit on the ground that it was
    insufficient to prove up its attachments as business records and to the McBride affidavit on the
    ground that it was prepared in anticipation of litigation. But on appeal, the Brewers make no
    complaint about the McBride affidavit. Instead, they argue only that the Black affidavit was
    insufficient as a business-records affidavit and was prepared in anticipation of litigation. Based
    on this argument, they conclude that “there exists a complete lack of evidence of a vital fact,
    namely that Appellants were served proper notice of the eviction.”
    Because the Brewers have not raised any argument on appeal attacking the McBride
    affidavit, which independently proves that the required notice to vacate was given, any challenge
    to that affidavit has not been preserved. See State Bar of Tex. v. Evans, 
    774 S.W.2d 656
    , 658 n.5
    (Tex. 1989) (per curiam) (appellate court erred by reversing judgment based on arguments not
    raised by the appellant); accord Adams v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 
    264 S.W.3d 424
    , 429
    n.3 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, pet. denied). In light of their issue on appeal, which attacks only
    the Black affidavit, we cannot agree with the Brewers that there is no evidence to support the
    notice element of the Bank’s claim.
    III. DISPOSITION
    For the foregoing reasons, we resolve the Brewers’ sole issue against them and affirm the
    trial court’s judgment.
    140045F.P05                                          /Bill Whitehill/
    BILL WHITEHILL
    JUSTICE
    –3–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    IRA W. BREWER, EUGENIA BREWER,                       On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 2                         No. 5, Collin County, Texas
    CANNONERO CIR, WYLIE, TX 75098,                      Trial Court Cause No. 005-01529-2013.
    Appellants                                           Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill.
    Justices Lang and Brown participating.
    No. 05-14-00045-CV         V.
    U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
    CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE BEAR
    STEARNS ARM TRUST, MORTGAGE
    PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES,
    SERIES 2004-2, ITS SUCCESSORS
    AND/OR ASSIGNS, Appellee
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is
    AFFIRMED.
    It is ORDERED that appellee U.S. BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
    CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE BEAR STEARNS ARM TRUST, MORTGAGE PASS-
    THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-2, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS
    recover its costs of this appeal and the accrued rent from appellants IRA W. BREWER,
    EUGENIA BREWER, AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 2 CANNONERO CIR, WYLIE,
    TX 75098 and the cash deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond. After all costs and rent have been
    paid, we order the clerk to release the balance, if any, to appellants IRA W. BREWER,
    EUGENIA BREWER, AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 2 CANNONERO CIR, WYLIE,
    TX 75098.
    Judgment entered April 6, 2015.
    –4–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-14-00045-CV

Filed Date: 4/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016