Tokes Adleye v. Magaret Modupe Driscal ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                   ACCEPTED
    14-14-00822-CV
    FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS                          HOUSTON, TEXAS
    5/6/2015 6:07:00 PM
    HOUSTON, TEXAS                                 CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    310THJUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2013-66224
    APPEAL NO.: 14-14-00822-CV         FILED IN
    14th COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    5/6/2015 6:07:00 PM
    TOKES TOSIN ADLEYE,                                   CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    Respondent!Appellant
    v.
    MARGARET MODUPE DRISCAL,
    Petitioner!Appellee
    ON APPEAL FROM THE 310TI-I JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT,
    HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
    APPELLEE'S OPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO FILE
    APPELLEE'S REPLY BRIEF
    Respectfully submitted,
    ~4~6&~f04``
    THEODORE HA      YNE~
    Attomey for Petitioner!Appellee
    Texas Bar No. 00787665
    P.O. Box 300833
    Houston, Texas 77230-0833
    Telephone: (713) 660-7646
    Telecopier: (713) 660-0203
    E-mail: thaynesjr@prodigy.net
    1
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
    Pursuant to rules 38.6(d) and 10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure, Petitioner!Appellee, MARGARET MODUPE DRlSCAL, (hereinafter
    "Driscal"), files this Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellee's Reply Brief.
    Driscal respectfully shows:
    1.
    This is an appeal from an October 9, 2014, granting of a Final Decree of
    Divorce, signed by the Honorable Judge, of the 3 10TH Judicial District Court, Harris
    County, Texas, in Cause No. 2013-66224, in the case styled, In the Matter of the
    Marriage ofMargaret Modupe Driscal and Tokes Tosin Adeleye.
    II.
    Driscal requests a ninety-day extension oftime for filing their Appellee's reply
    brief, thus creating a new due date of AUGUST 7, 2015. This is Driscal's first
    motion for extension of time to file the Appellants' brief. Because this case has not
    yet been set for submission, no unnecessary delay will result with the granting of this
    extension.
    2
    Ill.
    Driscal relies on the following facts to reasonably explain her need for her first
    extension.
    1. Attorney of record for Petitioner!Appellee, THEODORE HAYNES, JR.,
    received the Appellant's Brief of the Merits, on April 6, 2015, and did not have
    adequate time to prepare a meritorious defense on behalf of Petitioner/Appellee. The
    Appellant's Brief of the Merits is extremely lengthy and numbers one hundred and
    three (103) pages. Attorney of Record for Petitioner/Appellee did not have adequate
    time to use due diligence to locate, gather, organize and evaluate critical evidence.
    2.     The transcript was not received by the attorney of record for
    Petitioner/Appellee, THEODORE HAYNES, JR., until APRIL 15,2015.
    3. This motion     IS   for good cause and will not delay or prejudice the
    Respondent!Appellant.
    4. The parties disagree and this motion is opposed.
    3
    RELIEF
    Petitioner/Appellee respectfully request that the Honorable Court of Appeals
    grant a ninety-day extension for the filing of the Appellee's reply brief, thus creating
    a new due date of AUGUST 7, 2015. Driscal further request all other appropriate
    reliefto which she may be entitled.
    Dated MAY 6, 2015.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ``q ~
    THEODORE HAYNES, JR.
    Attorney for Petitioner!Appellee
    Texas Bar No. 00787665
    P.O. Box 300833
    Houston, Texas 77230-0833
    Telephone: (713) 660-7646
    Telecopier: (713) 660-0203
    E-mail: thaynesjr@prodigy.net
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    I THEODORE HAYNES, JR., Attorney of Record for Petitioner!Appellee,
    hereby certifY that I made a good faith effort to determine if the Appellee' s Opposed
    Motion for Extension of time to File Appellee's Reply Brief could be reconciled and
    settled in an uncontested proceeding with an agreed order. We have been unable to
    reach an agreement because Respondent/Appellant Pro Se, Tokes Tosin Adeleye,
    opposes the motion.
    SIGNED this       ~ T14-   day of _ _ ~
    _-n-_ _ _' 20 (5.
    ~ 1Vf(. ·~>
    Theodore Haynes,    Jr.      ~
    Attorney for Petitioner!Appellee
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certifY that a true and correct copy of the above Petitioner/Appellee's
    Opposed Motion for Extension of Time has been sent by facsimile and certified mail
    by depositing it enclosed in a postpaid, properly addressed wrapper in a post office or
    official depository under the care and custody of the United States Postal Service to
    Mr. Tokes Tosin Adeleye, 7091 Glen Cove Lane, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30087,
    Respondent!Appellant Pro Se.
    SIGNED this      G1
    m-     day of_~_--f...-_ _ _ _' 20 / C;
    ````
    Theodore Haynes, Jr.
    Attorney for Petitioner/Appellee
    5
    VERIFICATION
    STATE OF TEXAS             §
    COUNTY OF HARRIS           §
    BEFORE ME, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared
    THEODORE HAYNES, JR., who being by me duly sworn on his oath deposed and
    said that he is the Attorney of Record for Petitioner!Appellee in the above-entitled
    and numbered cause; that he has read the above and foregoing; and that every
    statement contained therein is within his personal knowledge and true and correct.
    ;t£!/ J£,
    SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME on the
    ,20   to certify which witness my hand and official seal.
    Gh-.      day of
    ~::3~
    ~gnature
    - /o``C57V
    (Notary's typed or
    printed name)
    My commission expires:_-+/,-t!_- _ "L--1-'--
    - . . (...."
    I. CO "---_ _
    (seal)                                . c
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-14-00822-CV

Filed Date: 5/6/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021