Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v. Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital Management, L.L.C. ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                 COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:        Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC v.
    Preston Marshall, Individually and Rusk Capital
    Management, L.L.C.
    Appellate case number:      01-16-00636-CV
    Trial court case number:    2015-35950
    Trial court:                11th District Court of Harris County
    The Clerk of this Court previously issued a “Notice of Removal to Federal Court”
    after appellants, Edwin K. Hunter and Hunter, Hunter & Sonnier, LLC (collectively
    “Hunter Parties”), notified this Court that defendant MarOpCo, Inc. had filed a notice of
    removal of the underlying trial court proceeding to federal district court. The Hunter
    Parties have filed a motion to extend the time to file their appellants’ brief, stating that
    the federal district court has remanded the case to the Harris County district court. See
    Marshall v. MarOpCo, Inc., No. 3:16-CV-3236-G, 
    2017 WL 697787
    (N.D. Tex. Feb. 22,
    2017). Accordingly, we reinstate the case on the Court’s docket.
    In their motion to extend time, the Hunter Parties request an extension of thirty
    days to April 12, 2017, to file their appellants’ brief. We grant the motion in part. The
    Hunter Parties’ appellants’ brief is due to be filed no later than April 3, 2017. See
    TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1, 38.6(a), (d).
    Appellees Preston Marshall and Rusk Capital Management, LLC (collectively
    “Rusk”) have filed a response to the motion to extend time in which they oppose the
    requested extension. Further, Rusk requests that, if we grant the Hunter Parties’
    extension request, “the Court also lift the stay and allow this case to finally proceed on
    the merits.” On September 1, 2016, we stayed the pretrial proceedings, including
    discovery, as to the Hunter Parties and noted that the order did affect any stay of “the
    commencement of any trial on the merits” pursuant to section 51.014(b) and (c) of the
    Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. We deny Rusk’s request to lift the stay issued
    on September 1, 2016.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature:   /s/ Terry Jennings
     Acting individually    Acting for the Court
    Date: March 9, 2017
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-16-00636-CV

Filed Date: 3/9/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/15/2017