in the Interest of O.J.S.D., a Child ( 2022 )

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-22-00642-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF O.J.S.D., a Child
From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2021-PA-01386
Honorable Kevin Henderson, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 30, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
This is an accelerated appeal from the trial court’s order of termination signed on June 2,
2022. Appellant’s notice of appeal was due within twenty days after the order was signed, which
was June 22, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b). Appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed until
September 29, 2022.
Because it appeared we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal, on October 11, 2022, we
ordered appellant to show cause in writing no later than October 21, 2022 why this appeal should
not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant is represented on appeal by appointed counsel
Mr. Ray Lopez and Mr. Shawn Sheffield. Neither attorney filed a response to our order on
appellant’s behalf. On October 27, 2022, we issued a second order directing Mr. Lopez and/or
Mr. Sheffield to show cause in writing no later than November 7, 2022 why this appeal should not
04-22-00642-CV
be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In this order, we cautioned counsel that a failure to respond
would subject this appeal to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
On November 15, 2022, Mr. Sheffield filed a response contending the final order was not
signed on June 2, 2022 and the “[t]rial attorney . . . stated he did not receive the Final Order until
9/20/22.” Mr. Sheffield asserts the failure to timely file the notice of appeal “was due to lack of
proper notice” and appellant and her appellate attorney have acted in good faith in filing the notice
of appeal. The clerk’s record on appeal contains a copy of the Order of Termination, which states:
“This ORDER was Rendered on June 2, 2022 and then incorporated into this Type-Written Order
and SIGNED ministerially on the date indicated below [Jun 02 2022].”
A motion for extension of time may have extended the time to invoke this court’s
jurisdiction until July 7, 2022. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997).
However, appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on September 29, 2022. “[O]nce the period for
granting a motion for extension of time . . . has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate
court’s jurisdiction.” Id. We also note the procedure parties may invoke to claim they received
late notice of a judgment was never utilized. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a.
Although appellant responded why this court should exercise its discretion to continue with
the appeal, the issue is not discretionary, and we must now dismiss the appeal for want of
jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617.
PER CURIAM
-2-