Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey v. McDonald's McDonald Headquarters ( 2022 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00349-CV
QUEEN'PRINYAH GODIAH NMIAA PAYNE'S EL-BEY,
Appellant
v.
MCDONALD'S; MCDONALD HEADQUARTERS,
Appellees
From the United States District Court
Eastern District of New York
Trial Court No. 20-CV-3031 (WFK)(LB)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Queen'Prinyah Godiah NMIAA Payne's El-Bey attempts to appeal a
“Memorandum & Order” issued by the Unites States District Court, Eastern District of
New York. By letter, the Clerk of this Court informed El-Bey that her appeal was subject
to dismissal because this Court has no jurisdiction over an action in or order from a
Federal Court. See TEX. CONT. art. V, § 6; TEX. GOV'T CODE § 22.201. In the same letter,
the Clerk warned El-Bey that the appeal would be dismissed unless El-Bey responded
showing grounds for continuing the appeal. El-Bey has not shown grounds for
continuing the appeal.
Also in the same letter, the Clerk warned El-Bey that this proceeding may be
determined to be frivolous and subsequently used in deciding whether El-Bey is a
vexatious litigant unless El-Bey explained why this proceeding should not be determined
to be frivolous. El-Bey has not explained why this proceeding should not be determined
to be frivolous.
Accordingly, this proceeding is determined to be frivolous, and it is dismissed for
want of jurisdiction.
Further, any documents presented to the Court by El-Bey that were filed as or
intended to be motions seeking relief from this Court which were not previously ruled
on by the Court are also dismissed because we have no jurisdiction to decide any motions
filed or presented for filing in this proceeding.
TOM GRAY
Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Johnson, and
Justice Smith
Appeal dismissed
Motions dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed December 7, 2022
[CV06]
El-Bey v. McDonald's, et al. Page 2