George A. Hall v. the County of Anderson , 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5123 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                    NO. 12-15-00090-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    GEORGE A. HALL,                                   §      APPEAL FROM THE 349TH
    APPELLANT
    V.                                                §      JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    THE COUNTY OF ANDERSON,
    APPELLEE                                          §      ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of
    Appellate Procedure.     TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The trial court’s judgment was signed on
    March 23, 2015. Thereafter, Appellant timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the
    information required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of
    service showing service on all parties to the trial court’s judgment.
    On April 10, 2015, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
    37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with rules of appellate
    procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed a proper notice of appeal
    on or before May 11, 2015, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 42.3.
    On May 8, 2015, Appellant filed a certificate of service showing that his notice of appeal
    had been sent to the clerk of the 349th District Court, Anderson County, Texas. However, this
    does not comply with Rules 9.5 and 25.1(e). On May 18, 2015, Appellant filed an amended
    notice of appeal. However, the certificate of service shows that he sent the notice of appeal to
    Appellee’s attorney at the Anderson County District Clerk’s Office in Palestine, Texas, instead
    of to the attorney’s mailing address in Waco, Texas. Consequently, Appellant has not shown
    that he has served Appellee with a copy of his notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 25.1(e).
    Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.
    Opinion delivered May 20, 2015.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    2
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    MAY 20, 2015
    NO. 12-15-00090-CV
    GEORGE A. HALL,
    Appellant
    V.
    THE COUNTY OF ANDERSON,
    Appellee
    Appeal from the 349th District Court
    of Anderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 349-7331)
    THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same
    being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.
    It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that
    this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of
    Appellate Procedure; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: NO. 12-15-00090-CV

Citation Numbers: 463 S.W.3d 673, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5123, 2015 WL 2405490

Judges: Worthen, Hoyle, Neeley

Filed Date: 5/20/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024