Steven Chavez v. State ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                      COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    §               No. 08-19-00290-CR
    STEVEN CHAVEZ,
    §                  Appeal from the
    Appellant,
    §                 41st District Court
    v.
    §             of El Paso County, Texas
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    §               (TC# 20170D01512)
    State.
    §
    ORDER
    On December 11, 2019, this Court ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine
    whether the appellate is entitled to court-appointed counsel or if he wished to proceed pro se.
    The trial court held a hearing and found that the defendant, as part of a plea agreement,
    waived his right to appeal and signed a trial court certification of rights affirming he was advise of
    his right to appeal. As such, the trial court concluded that "the appointment of appellate counsel is
    not necessary" but noted that the trial court "would respectfully seek further guidance from the
    Court of Appeals in light of the apparent waiver of appellate rights executed by the Appellant."
    Although the trial court has concluded that Appellant apparently waived his right to appeal
    as part of a plea bargain, the appointment of appellate counsel is still required under these
    circumstances. An eligible indigent defendant is entitled to have the trial court appoint an attorney
    to represent him in an appeal to the court of appeals. Tex.Code Crim.Proc. art. 1.051(d)(1); see
    also Cooks v. State, 
    240 S.W.3d 906
    , 910 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007).
    Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether
    appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel, or if he wishes to proceed pro se. The trial
    court shall enter all necessary orders and/or findings which may include appointing counsel to
    represent Appellant on appeal.
    1
    In the event Appellant elects to proceed pro se, the trial court shall make Appellant aware
    of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation and develop evidence as to whether
    appellant’s apparent decision to relinquish benefits associated with counsel and to proceed pro se
    is knowingly and intelligently made under Hubbard v. State, 
    739 S.W.2d 341
    (Tex.Crim.App.
    1987).
    The trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, Texas, on
    or before January 17, 2020. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s
    record containing the findings and any order appointing counsel, and forward the same to this
    Court on or before January 24, 2020. Further, the transcription of the hearing shall be prepared,
    certified and filed with this Court on or before February 7, 2020.
    IT IS SO ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2020.
    PER CURIAM
    Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-19-00290-CR

Filed Date: 1/7/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/9/2020