Davie Harrison v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                      In the
    Court of Appeals
    Second Appellate District of Texas
    at Fort Worth
    ___________________________
    No. 02-19-00437-CV
    ___________________________
    DAVIE HARRISON, Appellant
    V.
    STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Appellee
    On Appeal from the 348th District Court
    Tarrant County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 348-299043-18
    Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.
    Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Davie Harrison attempts to appeal from four interlocutory orders signed on
    October 24, 2019: separate orders denying Harrison’s motion to reconsider and
    motion to vacate an August 15, 2019 order that granted defendant State Farm Mutual
    Automobile Insurance Company’s plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed Harrison’s
    claims against State Farm; an order denying Harrison’s motion for sanctions against
    State Farm; and an order denying Harrison’s motion for a default judgment against
    State Farm.
    We have jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments and from specific types
    of interlocutory orders made appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har–Con Corp., 
    39 S.W.3d 191
    , 195 (Tex. 2001); see, e.g., Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014. To
    be final and appealable, a judgment must dispose of all parties and all issues. 
    Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 195
    .
    Although the trial court dismissed the suit against State Farm, that order is not
    final because the trial court has not disposed of Harrison’s claims against other
    defendants. Although Harrison has filed a motion to sever the claims against State
    Farm, the trial court has not ruled on that motion. Thus, the order dismissing State
    Farm is not final. And no statute allows an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s
    order granting a plea to the jurisdiction and dismissing claims against a party other
    than a governmental unit. Cf. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8).
    2
    Accordingly, we dismiss Harrison’s appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R.
    App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
    Per Curiam
    Delivered: January 9, 2020
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-19-00437-CV

Filed Date: 1/9/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/11/2020