in Re Jennifer Gayle Janvier ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •                                  NUMBER 13-20-00005-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    IN RE JENNIFER GAYLE JANVIER
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria 1
    On January 3, 2020, relator Jennifer Gayle Janvier filed a petition for writ of
    mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to transfer the underlying case from Kleberg
    County, Texas, to Victoria County, Texas, based on mandatory venue provisions found
    in the Texas Family Code. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 155.201. The Court requested
    that the real party in interest, Justin Lee Todd, or any others whose interest would be
    1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in
    any other case,” but when “denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do
    so.”); 
    id. R. 47.4
    (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
    directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus.
    See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. However, relator has now filed a motion to dismiss
    this original proceeding on grounds that the trial court has granted her motion to transfer,
    thereby rendering moot the relief requested in the petition for writ of mandamus.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the
    opinion that it should be granted. See City of Krum, Tex. v. Rice, 
    543 S.W.3d 747
    , 749
    (Tex. 2017) (per curiam) (stating that a case is moot when either no live controversy exists
    between the parties or the parties have no legally cognizable interest in the outcome);
    Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 
    369 S.W.3d 137
    , 162 (Tex. 2012) (“Put simply, a case is
    moot when the court’s action on the merits cannot affect the parties’ rights or interests.”);
    In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 
    166 S.W.3d 732
    , 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A
    case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of
    the legal proceedings, including the appeal.”). Accordingly, we GRANT relator’s motion
    to dismiss this original proceeding and we DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus as
    moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
    NORA L. LONGORIA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed the
    14th day of January, 2020.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-20-00005-CV

Filed Date: 1/14/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/16/2020