Harold Haswell v. Cach, Llc ( 2021 )

DISMISS; Opinion Filed June 29, 2021
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-01277-CV
HAROLD HASWELL, Appellant
V.
CACH, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 004-01615-2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle
Opinion by Justice Schenck
On October 25, 2016, Harold Haswell filed his notice of appeal of the trial
court’s judgment in favor of appellee CACH, LLC. After Haswell filed his brief,
CACH informed the Court that it had filed for bankruptcy. Accordingly, we abated
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2.
On October 11, 2019, we received CACH’s motion to reinstate and dismiss
the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3. However, as we noted by letter dated October
14, 2019, Haswell’s signature was required and allowed him an opportunity to file
an amended motion complying with the rule. On November 6, 2019, the Court
granted CACH’s motion insofar as the appeal was reinstated but denied insofar as it
sought dismissal.
On May 27, 2021, we sent a letter to Haswell, informing him that because he
had not communicated with this Court since February 10, 2017, we would dismiss
his appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of the date of the letter, he
responded with cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 42.3(b)(c). Haswell has not responded or otherwise communicated with this
Court since. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal. See id.
/David J. Schenck/
DAVID J. SCHENCK
JUSTICE
161277F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
HAROLD HASWELL, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at
Law No. 4, Collin County, Texas
No. 05-16-01277-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. 004-01615-
2016.
CACH, LLC, Appellee Opinion delivered by Justice
Schenck. Justices Reichek and
Carlyle participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee CACH, LLC recover its costs of this appeal
from appellant HAROLD HASWELL.
Judgment entered this 29th day of June 2021.
–3–