Owen Tate Emmett v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                       In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    ________________
    NO. 09-22-00185-CR
    ________________
    OWEN TATE EMMETT, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    ________________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 435th District Court
    Montgomery County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. 19-11-15408-CR
    ________________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Appellant Owen Emmett pleaded guilty
    to injury to a child, a first-degree felony. See 
    Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.04
    (a)(1).
    The plea agreement provided for a maximum of 45 years imprisonment, allowed the
    trial court to assess Appellant’s punishment, and permitted Appellant to appeal his
    sentence. Following a hearing, the trial court sentenced Appellant to 40 years in the
    1
    Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. This appeal
    followed.
    Emmett’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s
    professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous; he also
    filed a motion to withdraw as counsel. See Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
     (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On October 4, 2022,
    we notified Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief and notified him of the
    deadline for doing so, but we received no response from Appellant. We have
    reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no
    arguable issues support the appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order
    appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1
    AFFIRMED.
    ________________________________
    JAY WRIGHT
    Justice
    Submitted on January 27, 2023
    Opinion Delivered March 15, 2023
    Do Not Publish
    Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
    1
    Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
    discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-22-00185-CR

Filed Date: 3/15/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/17/2023