in the Interest of G.S.C., a Child ( 2021 )

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 26, 2021.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00815-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF G.S.C., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 245th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2013-47425
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appeal from an order signed October 29, 2020 denying
appellant Marcus Jacquot’s request for a de novo hearing.
Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v.
Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all
pending parties and claims, the orders remain interlocutory and unappealable until
final judgment is rendered unless a statutory exception applies. Bally Total Fitness
Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps,
842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). No statutory exception permits
an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a request for a de novo hearing.1
On December 29, 2020, notification was transmitted to the parties of this
court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant filed
a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before January 8,
2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant did not file a response in this appeal;
instead, he filed a petition for writ of mandamus regarding the same order. See No.
14-21-00022-CV, In re Jacquot.
This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion to
consolidate and motion to extend time to pay for the record are both denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain.
1
Section 201.016 of the Texas Family Code provides that a party’s failure to request a de
novo hearing or waiver of the right to request a de novo hearing does not deprive that party of the
right to appeal. Tex. Fam. Code § 201.106(a). That section does not create a right of appeal the
denial of a de novo section.
2