Armando Trevino v. Karla Belen Garcia, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Maria Luisa Aguilar ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-21-00188-CV
    Armando TREVINO,
    Appellant
    v.
    Karla Belen GARCIA, Individually and as Administratrix of The Estate of Maria Luisa Aguilar,
    Appellee
    From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2020CVF002238-D4
    Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
    Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: June 30, 2021
    DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION
    Appellant appeals from a final order dismissing a case pursuant to Texas Civil Practice and
    Remedies Code chapter 27. Pursuant to section 27.008(b), “[a]n appellate court shall expedite an
    appeal or other writ, whether interlocutory or not, from a trial court order on a motion to dismiss
    a legal action under Section 27.003 . . ..” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 27.008(b). Accelerated
    appeals include “appeals required by statute to be accelerated or expedited.” See TEX. R. APP. P.
    28.1(a). In an accelerated appeal, such as this one, the notice of appeal is due within twenty days
    after the date the judgment or order is signed. See id. 26.1(b). Without a timely notice of appeal,
    this court lacks jurisdiction. See id. 25.1(b).
    04-21-00188-CV
    The trial court signed a final order granting appellee’s chapter 27 motion to dismiss and
    awarding attorney’s fees on April 9, 2021. Although appellant filed both a request for findings of
    fact and conclusions of law and a motion for new trial, in an accelerated appeal, neither of these
    filings extends the time to file a notice of appeal. See id. 28.1(b). Accordingly, the notice of appeal
    was due on April 29, 2021, twenty days after the date the order was signed. See id. 26.1(b).
    Appellant filed his notice of appeal on May 10, 2021. He did not file a motion for extension of
    time.
    Nevertheless, the appellate rules permit this court to extend the time for filing the notice of
    appeal if a party files the notice of appeal in the trial court and a motion for extension of time in
    this court within fifteen days “after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal.” See id. 26.3.
    Appellant filed his notice of appeal within this fifteen-day window. Thus, we must imply a motion
    for extension of time if he can show a reasonable explanation for the late filing. Verburgt v. Dorner,
    
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997) (implying motion for extension of time to file appellate bond
    when bond was filed late but within fifteen-day period for filing motion for extension); see also
    Houser v. McElveen, 
    243 S.W.3d 646
    , 646-47 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam)
    (implying motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal when notice of appeal was filed late
    but was mailed within the fifteen-day deadline).
    On May 19, 2021, this court ordered appellant to file, in writing, a reasonable explanation
    for failing to timely file his notice of appeal no later than June 1, 2021. Our order cautioned
    appellant that if he did not provide a reasonable explanation by June 1, 2021, this appeal was
    subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant did not respond;
    therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-21-00188-CV

Filed Date: 6/30/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/6/2021