In Re: United Specialty Insurance Company v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • DENY and Opinion Filed March 21, 2023
    S  In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-23-00036-CV
    IN RE UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 95th District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-01250
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel
    Opinion by Justice Nowell
    In this original proceeding, relator seeks mandamus relief from the trial
    court’s order granting real party in interest’s motion to quash non-party discovery
    requests and motion for protection.
    Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
    clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate remedy by appeal. In
    re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
    proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that
    relator has failed to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion.
    Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    52.8(a).
    /Erin A. Nowell/
    ERIN A. NOWELL
    JUSTICE
    230036F.P05
    –2–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-23-00036-CV

Filed Date: 3/21/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/29/2023