in Re David Elliott ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                       In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    _________________
    NO. 09-15-00262-CV
    _________________
    IN RE DAVID ELLIOTT
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Original Proceeding
    ________________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    David Elliott petitioned for a writ of mandamus compelling the 356th
    District Court of Hardin County, Texas, to vacate the temporary orders signed on
    June 25, 2015, in a recently-commenced divorce case. See generally Tex. Gov’t
    Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Elliott asks this
    Court to compel the trial court to sign temporary orders that provide for a standard
    possession order that includes summer visitation and additional “makeup
    visitation” in Virginia where he resides. Elliott filed a motion requesting that this
    Court award him a six-week visitation period in Virginia and additional visitation
    for missed Spring visitation previously agreed to by the parties, as temporary relief
    pending the determination of the merits of his mandamus petition. See generally
    Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(a).
    Elliott contends there is insufficient evidence in the record of the hearing on
    temporary orders to rebut the presumption that a standard possession order should
    be entered. See generally Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 105.001(g); 153.252 (West
    2014). After considering the mandamus petition and the response filed by the real
    party in interest, the temporary nature of the orders at issue, and the records
    submitted by the parties for review by this Court (which does not include
    everything the trial court considered in reaching the decision regarding the
    temporary orders at issue), we conclude that the relator has not established that the
    trial court clearly abused its discretion. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 153.253 (West
    2014). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for
    temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
    PETITION DENIED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on July 15, 2015
    Opinion Delivered July 24, 2015
    Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-15-00262-CV

Filed Date: 7/27/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021