in Re: Ashley Pardo and Daniel Pardo, Individually and as Next Friend for K.D.P.. a Minor ( 2019 )

Denied; Opinion Filed August 21, 2019.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-19-00911-CV
IN RE A.P. AND D. P., INDIVIDUALLY AND
AS NEXT FRIENDS FOR K.D.P., A MINOR, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 422nd Judicial District Court
Kaufman County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 102717-CC
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Myers, Molberg, and Nowell
Opinion by Justice Myers
Before the Court is relators’ petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have our Court vacate
the trial court’s July 24, 2019 temporary orders and compel the trial court to return their child,
K.D.P., to their custody. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court
has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). After
reviewing the petition and mandamus record, we conclude relators have not shown they are entitled
to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a)
(the court must deny the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Lana Myers/
LANA MYERS
JUSTICE
190911F.P05
–2–