in the Interest of B. R. F., a Child ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                     COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    IN THE INTEREST OF                                  §
    B.R.F,                                              §             No. 08-21-00110-CV
    A CHILD.                                            §               Appeal from the
    §             109th District Court
    §          of Winkler County, Texas
    §             (TC# DC20-17,846)
    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be
    dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has not complied with multiple
    directives for information from the Clerk's Office, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
    Father C.J.H., pro se, appealed an order granting Mother C.M.F.’s private petition to
    terminate Father’s parental rights to Child B.R.F. on June 17, 2021. Since filing his notice of
    appeal, Father has failed to: (1) pay the $205 filing fee to this Court or otherwise show he is exempt
    from paying costs; (2) comply with the Court’s request for a reasonable explanation for why his
    notice of appeal was late but within the 15-day grace period as required under Verburgt v. Dorner,
    
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997); (3) make payment arrangements with the district clerk for the
    1
    clerk’s record; and (4) failed to make payment arrangements with the court reporter for the
    reporter’s records.
    The Clerk of the Court has sent multiple letters asking Father to correct each of these
    matters, informing Father that failure to correct these matters could result in dismissal without
    further notice. As of this date, we have not received any response to the Clerk’s correspondence.
    This Court has the ability to dismiss a case for want of prosecution, or to dismiss a case
    because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a
    notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specific time. See TEX. R. APP.
    P. 42.3(b), (c). Because Father has failed to take any action to prosecute this appeal or respond to
    directives from the Clerk of the Court, we dismiss this case for want of prosecution.
    GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
    July 30, 2021
    Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-21-00110-CV

Filed Date: 7/30/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2021