David Sanchez Rocha v. the State of Texas ( 2022 )


Menu:
  •                          NUMBERS 13-21-00193-CR
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    DAVID SANCHEZ ROCHA,                                                        Appellant,
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.
    On appeal from the 139th District Court
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ORDER OF ABATEMENT
    Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva
    Order Per Curiam
    This cause is before the Court on appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of new
    counsel and motion for pro se access to the record. On March 11, 2022, an Anders brief
    was filed in this matter. Now, acting pro se, appellant requests new counsel be appointed
    claiming he has previously asked his counsel to withdraw from the case for lack of
    attention. Appellant requests different counsel to review and proceed with this appeal.
    Appellant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel, and we have a duty to
    ensure that appellant’s rights are protected. However, appellant does not have the right
    to dictate the counsel of his choosing and appointment of new counsel rests within the
    sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State, 
    176 S.W.3d 249
    , 255 (Tex. App. –
    Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of
    counsel may be necessary, an appellate court should abate the proceeding to the trial
    court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we carry both motions, abate the
    appeal, and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with
    this order.
    Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant is entitled to court-
    appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the
    name, address, email address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly
    appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. If the trial court
    determines appellant has abandoned this appeal and/or is not entitled to court-
    appointment counsel, it shall issue such findings. The trial court shall further cause its
    findings and/or order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the
    Clerk of the Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish.
    TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Delivered and filed on the
    5th day of April, 2022.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-21-00193-CR

Filed Date: 4/5/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/3/2022