in Re City of Aransas Pass ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                NUMBER 13-21-00224-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    IN RE CITY OF ARANSAS PASS
    On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Tijerina
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina1
    By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, the City of Aransas Pass, Texas (the
    City), sought to compel the trial court to quash deposition notices directed to Mayor
    Ramiro Gomez, Council Members Carrie Scruggs, Jan Moore, and Vickie Abrego, and
    former Council Member Billy Ellis. However, the City has now filed an unopposed motion
    to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the parties have reached an
    1  See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
    required to do so,” but “[w]hen granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case”);
    id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
    agreement concerning the matters in dispute. The City contends that the petition for writ
    of mandamus has been rendered moot and it requests that we dismiss this original
    proceeding.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss
    this original proceeding, is of the opinion that it should be granted. See Heckman v.
    Williamson County, 
    369 S.W.3d 137
    , 162 (Tex. 2012) (“A case becomes moot if, since
    the time of filing, there has ceased to exist a justiciable controversy between the parties—
    that is, if the issues presented are no longer ‘live,’ or if the parties lack a legally cognizable
    interest in the outcome.”); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 
    166 S.W.3d 732
    , 737 (Tex.
    2005) (orig. proceeding) (stating that a case becomes moot “if a controversy ceases to
    exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings”); see also In re Smith
    County, 
    521 S.W.3d 447
    , 455 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2017, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we
    lift the stay previously imposed in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated
    or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally
    decided.”). We grant the unopposed motion to dismiss and we dismiss this original
    proceeding as moot.
    JAIME TIJERINA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    11th day of August, 2021.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-21-00224-CV

Filed Date: 8/11/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/16/2021