Michael Adam Kozitzki v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-23-00511-CR
    Michael Adam KOZITZKI,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2022-CR-11431
    Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
    Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
    Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: June 7, 2023
    DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
    In the underlying criminal case, appellant was indicted for the offense of assault-family-
    second offense. On April 17, 2023, the trial court granted the State’s motion to dismiss and
    dismissed the underlying criminal case. On April 24, 2023, appellant filed a notice of appeal
    challenging the trial court’s dismissal order.
    “[I]n Texas, appeals by either the State or the defendant in a criminal case are permitted
    only when they are specifically authorized by statute.” State ex rel. Lykos v. Fine, 
    330 S.W.3d 904
    ,
    915 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). Under Texas law, a criminal defendant is permitted to appeal only
    04-23-00511-CR
    judgments of conviction and other designated appealable orders. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.
    44.02; TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). A criminal defendant is not permitted to appeal a trial court’s
    order dismissing a charge against him. See Bohannan v. State, 
    352 S.W.3d 47
    , 48 (Tex. App.—
    Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref’d) (dismissing for lack of jurisdiction a defendant’s appeal from an order
    dismissing the criminal charges filed against him); Petty v. State, 
    800 S.W.2d 582
    , 583-84 (Tex.
    App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.) (concluding an order dismissing an indictment is not an order from
    which a criminal defendant can appeal).
    We ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
    jurisdiction. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a response agreeing that appellant is not
    permitted to appeal the trial court’s dismissal order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack
    of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-23-00511-CR

Filed Date: 6/7/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/13/2023