In the Interest of L.D.B. and L.D.B. v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                        In The
    Court of Appeals
    Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
    __________________
    NO. 09-23-00155-CV
    __________________
    IN THE INTEREST OF L.D.B. AND L.D.B.
    __________________________________________________________________
    On Appeal from the 279th District Court
    Jefferson County, Texas
    Trial Cause No. F-213,320-C
    __________________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    M.D.B. 1 appealed the trial court’s final order modifying a support order in a
    suit affecting the parent-child relationship. M.D.B., who is the appellant, did not pay
    the filing fee for the appeal.
    On July 10, 2023, we notified the parties that the appellant had not remitted
    the filing fee, and we warned the appellant that the appeal would be dismissed
    without further notice unless the filing fee was paid by July 5, 2023.
    1We refer to the appellant by his initials. See 
    Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 109.002
    (d).
    1
    On July 19, 2023, the District Clerk notified the Court that the appellant had
    failed to pay or to make the arrangements necessary for the District Clerk to prepare
    the clerk’s record. Consequently, we notified the parties that the appellant had not
    established indigent status, that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to the
    appellant’s failure to pay or to arrange to pay the fee required to prepare the clerk’s
    record. We also warned the appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of
    prosecution unless the appellant established that he had made the arrangements
    required to pay the fee or that he needed more time to do so. See Tex. R. App. P.
    37.3(b).
    After the Clerk sent the parties a letter warning of the consequences of a
    failure to take the action necessary to file the clerk’s record, the Court did not receive
    a response. In the absence of a satisfactory explanation that justifies the appellant’s
    failure to pay or make the arrangements needed to pay for the clerk’s record to
    support his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.
    P. 37.3(b), 42.3, 43.2(f).
    APPEAL DISMISSED.
    PER CURIAM
    Submitted on August 23, 2023
    Opinion Delivered August 24, 2023
    Before Horton, Johnson and Wright, JJ.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 09-23-00155-CV

Filed Date: 8/24/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/25/2023