Tim Schoenbauer v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 1, 2023
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-23-00416-CV
    TIM SCHOENBAUER, Appellant
    V.
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE
    TRUSTEE FOR NEW CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-1,
    Appellee
    On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-15993
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Nowell, Goldstein, and Breedlove
    Opinion by Justice Breedlove
    We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal of the trial court’s order of
    nonsuit dismissing appellee’s claims against appellant because it appeared to be
    moot. We directed appellant to file a letter brief addressing our concern.
    A plaintiff may take a non-suit at any time before it has introduced all of its
    evidence. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 162. When there are no pending counterclaims, the
    effect of a nonsuit of all of a plaintiff’s claims is to render the case moot. See
    Travelers Ins. Co. v. Joachim, 
    315 S.W.3d 860
    , 862 (Tex. 2010). Appellate courts
    lack jurisdiction to decide moot controversies. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n
    v. Jones, 
    1 S.W.3d 83
    , 86 (Tex. 1999).
    Although appellant’s arguments in his letter brief are difficult to discern, he
    argues, in part, that the order of nonsuit was improper because he had counterclaims
    pending. Counterclaims are subject to the payment of a mandatory filing fee. No
    right to be heard on counterclaims exists until the fee is paid and the filing is
    complete. See Jamar v. Patterson, 
    868 S.W.2d 318
    , 319 (Tex. 1993); In re C.A.S.,
    
    128 S.W.3d 681
    , 686 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2003, no pet.). Because the record before
    the Court reflects that appellant did not pay the required mandatory filing fee, the
    order of nonsuit of all of appellee’s claims against appellant rendered the case moot.
    Because a controversy no longer exists between appellant and appellee, we
    dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 1
    S.W.3d at 86; TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    /Maricela Breedlove/
    230416f.p05                                MARICELA BREEDLOVE
    JUSTICE
    –2–
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    TIM SCHOENBAUER, Appellant                   On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial
    District Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-23-00416-CV          V.               Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-15993.
    Opinion delivered by Justice
    DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL                       Breedlove. Justices Nowell and
    TRUST COMPANY, AS                            Goldstein participating.
    INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR NEW
    CENTURY HOME EQUITY LOAN
    TRUST 2004-1, Appellee
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
    DISMISSED.
    It is ORDERED that appellee DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
    COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE FOR NEW CENTURY HOME
    EQUITY LOAN TRUST 2004-1 recover its costs of this appeal from appellant TIM
    SCHOENBAUER.
    Judgment entered this 1st day of August, 2023.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-23-00416-CV

Filed Date: 8/1/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/9/2023