Kenneth Ray Shed v. the State of Texas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                                     In The
    Court of Appeals
    Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
    No. 07-23-00245-CR
    KENNETH SHED, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    On Appeal from the 140th District Court
    Lubbock County, Texas
    Trial Court No. DC-2023-CR-1018 (Counts I – VII), Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding
    July 31, 2023
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
    Appellant, Kenneth Shed, appeals his convictions for indecency with a child,1
    sexual assault of a child (three counts),2 and aggravated sexual assault of a child (three
    counts).3 We dismiss the untimely appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 21.11(a)(1).
    2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.011(a)(2).
    3 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(2)(b).
    On June 2, 2023, the trial court sentenced Appellant to seven concurrent life
    sentences. Appellant’s motion for new trial was due within thirty days of sentencing, by
    July 3, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 21.4(a). Appellant filed a motion for new trial
    on July 5, 2023. Because the motion for new trial was not timely filed, it did not extend
    Appellant’s deadline to file a notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a) (requiring a
    notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentencing or within ninety days if a
    timely motion for new trial is filed). As a result, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due within
    thirty days after sentence was imposed, by July 3, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).
    Appellant filed a notice of appeal on July 5, 2023, without filing a motion for an extension
    of time. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3 (permitting an appellate court to extend the
    appellate deadline by fifteen days if a motion for extension is filed that reasonably explains
    the need for an extension).
    The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
    hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 
    369 S.W.3d 196
    , 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a
    notice of appeal is not timely filed, an appellate court has no option but to dismiss the
    appeal for want of jurisdiction. 
    Id.
     By letter of July 10, 2023, we notified Appellant of the
    consequences of his late notice of appeal and directed him to file a motion for an
    extension of time within the fifteen-day extension period under Rule 26.3, i.e. before July
    18, or the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3;
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (en banc) (“When a notice of
    appeal, but no motion for extension of time, is filed within the fifteen-day period, the court
    of appeals lacks jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than
    2
    by dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction.”). Appellant has not filed a motion for an extension
    of time and has had no further communication with this Court to date.
    Because Appellant’s untimely notice of appeal prevents this Court from acquiring
    jurisdiction over the appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.4
    Per Curiam
    Do not publish.
    4 Appellant may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to
    the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.
    art. 11.07.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-23-00245-CR

Filed Date: 7/31/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023