Kill Buch Platinum, LLC D/B/A Platinum Auto Group v. Craig Potts ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBER 13-24-00076-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    KILL BUCH PLATINUM, LLC
    D/B/A PLATINUM AUTO GROUP,                                                          Appellant,
    v.
    CRAIG POTTS,                                                                          Appellee.
    On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
    of Travis County, Texas.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Longoria, Silva, and Peña
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria
    This cause is before the Court on appellee’s motion to dismiss for want of
    jurisdiction. 1 We now dismiss the matter for want of jurisdiction.
    1
    This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
    equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
    On October 25, 2023, the trial court entered a default judgment in this matter. On
    December 8, 2023, an email was sent to the trial court indicating appellant desired to
    appeal the judgment. The email appears to be from Danny Bucher, who is not currently
    a licensed attorney in the State of Texas.
    On January 17, 2024, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the appeal has
    not been timely perfected, so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be
    done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the
    date of the Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. The Clerk of the Court also
    notified appellant that it appears they are unrepresented by an attorney and that only a
    licensed attorney may appear and represent a corporation in litigation. See Kunstoplast
    of Am. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA, 
    937 S.W.2d 455
    , 456 (Tex. 1996). Appellant was
    instructed to explain who has legal authority to act on behalf of appellant by January 26,
    2024. Appellant has failed to respond to either notice.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and
    appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be
    dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for want of
    jurisdiction and appellee’s motion is dismissed as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), (c).
    NORA L. LONGORIA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    15th day of February, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-24-00076-CV

Filed Date: 2/15/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/17/2024