In Re Ed Monce v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                NUMBER 13-24-00319-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    IN RE ED MONCE
    ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Tijerina and Peña
    Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1
    Relator Ed Monce filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial
    court to vacate a temporary restraining order and an extension order; however, relator
    has now filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus.
    According to the unopposed motion to dismiss, relator has reached an agreement with
    real parties in interest Christopher Majka, Tressa Majka, and Esplanade Investments
    1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not
    required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R.
    47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
    L.L.C. that disposes of the necessity of seeking mandamus relief.
    The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to
    dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously
    imposed in this case, we grant the unopposed motion to dismiss, and we dismiss the
    petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10.
    DORI CONTRERAS
    Chief Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    27th day of June, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-24-00319-CV

Filed Date: 6/27/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/29/2024