Marquis Dwaine Viser v. the State of Texas ( 2024 )

Opinion issued July 2, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-24-00294-CR
———————————
MARQUIS DWAINE VISER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 300th District Court
Brazoria County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 93282-CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Marquis Dwaine Viser was convicted on February 13, 2024, of
the offense of unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon—enhanced. Appellant
filed a pro se notice of appeal on April 12, 2024. On June 17, 2024, appellant filed
a motion for an out-of-time appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’
jurisdiction.” Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). To be
timely filed, a notice of appeal must be filed either within 30 days after the trial
court’s judgment is signed, or within 90 days after the signing of the judgment if
the defendant filed a timely motion for new trial. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2. If the
notice of appeal is filed within 15 days of the deadline, an appellate court may
grant an extension of time if a motion for extension is filed within 15 days of the
deadline. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.
Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed 58 days after the judgment was
signed. Neither the notice of appeal nor the motion was filed within 15 days of the
deadline. Thus, appellant is not entitled to an extension under Rule 26.3 and this
Court lacks jurisdiction. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522, 524; Kossie v. State, No.
01-16-00738-CR, 2017 WL 631842, at *2 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb.
16, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Although appellant seeks an out-of-time appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction
to grant this relief. We “may obtain jurisdiction after those deadlines have passed
if the Court of Criminal appeals grants the defendant the ability to pursue an out-
of-time appeal.” See Kossie, 2017 WL 631842, at *1–2. We have no authority to
grant appellant an out-of-time appeal. See Setzco v. State, No. 10-22-00301-CR,
2022 WL 4376733, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 21, 2022, no pet.) (mem. op.,
2
not designated for publication); Perez v. State, No. 14-06-00091-CR, 2006 WL
1027058 at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 20, 2006, pet. dism’d)
(mem. op., not designated for publication).
Because we lack jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal. Any pending motions
are dismissed as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
3