Nahesi Parmes v. First Central Credit Union ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                              NUMBER 13-24-00027-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
    NAHESI PARMES,                                                                          Appellant,
    v.
    FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION,                                                              Appellee.
    On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
    of McLennan County, Texas.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
    On December 1, 2023, appellant Nahesi Parmes filed a pro se notice of appeal
    from an order granting summary judgment in trial court cause number 20221073CV1.1
    On December 1, 2023, the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to pay the $205.00
    1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket
    equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
    filing fee within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or
    these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—
    whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may
    enforce this rule by any order that is just.”); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (delineating
    the required fees and costs in an appellate court).
    On December 21, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the filing fee
    was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was
    not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). On January 19, 2024, the Clerk again advised appellant
    that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if
    the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c).
    To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee for the appeal nor responded to
    the Clerk of the Court’s notices. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal because
    the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order,
    or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See
    id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 
    521 S.W.3d 75
    , 76 (Tex. App.—San
    Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not
    otherwise responded to the Clerk’s notices. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).
    JAIME TIJERINA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed on the
    7th day of March, 2024.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-24-00027-CV

Filed Date: 3/7/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/9/2024